https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:45036 N = 52) were grouped based on their responses to the Buss–Durkee Hostility Inventory. They were then presented with affect-inducing images while brain event-related potentials (ERPs) and startle reflex modulation (SRM) were recorded to determine non-language-based processes. Explicit valence and arousal ratings for each image were taken to determine subjective affective effects. Results indicated no significant group differences for explicit ratings and SRM. However, ERP results demonstrated significant group differences between the ‘pleasant’ and ‘violent’ emotion condition in the frontal, central and parietal areas across both hemispheres. These findings suggest that parts of the brain process affective stimuli different to what conscious appraisal comes up with in participants varying in self-reported aggression.]]> Wed 26 Oct 2022 11:06:51 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:10485 Wed 11 Apr 2018 17:20:37 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:27854 Wed 09 Feb 2022 15:57:13 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:44475 Wed 06 Sep 2023 10:49:18 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:46472 N = 156). The parametric model accounted for both stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) and trigger failure (i.e., failures to initiate the inhibition process). The returned SSRT estimate (SSRT_EXG3) was attenuated by ≈65 ms compared to traditional nonparametric SSRT estimates (SSRT_int). The amplitude and latency of the N1 and P3 event-related potential components were derived for both stop-success and stop-failure trials and compared to behavioral estimates derived from traditional (SSRT_int) and parametric (SSRT_EXG3, trigger failure) models. Both the fronto-central N1 and P3 peaked earlier and were larger for stop-success than stop-failure trials. For stop-failure trials only, N1 peak latency correlated with both SSRT estimates as well as trigger failure and temporally coincided with SSRT_EXG3, but not SSRT_int. In contrast, P3 peak and onset latency were not associated with any behavioral estimates of inhibition for either trial type. While the N1 peaked earlier for stop-success than stop-failure trials, this effect was not found in poor task performers (i.e., high trigger failure/slow SSRT). These findings are consistent with attentional modulation of both the speed and reliability of the inhibition process, but not for poor performers. Together with the absence of any P3 onset latency effect, our findings suggest that attentional mechanisms are important in supporting speeded and reliable inhibition processes required in the stop-signal task.]]> Thu 02 Nov 2023 09:54:53 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:7506 Sat 24 Mar 2018 08:38:32 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:1314 Sat 24 Mar 2018 08:32:44 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:20124 Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:51:45 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:4771 Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:20:38 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:24085 Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:11:47 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:30408 Mon 23 Sep 2019 12:51:41 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:41262 Mon 01 Aug 2022 09:21:32 AEST ]]>